One-Sided Truths and Playing Dirty
Well, I guess that the Capobianco Camp didn’t like seeing the court transcripts of Christy Maldonado and Veronica Rose’s grandmother Alice Brown coming out because somehow half the truth is now making the rounds. As of this morning, September 3, 2013, part of the cross examination of Dusten Brown by Mr. Godwin has appeared on this brand new, unable-to-trace url, as it is a free hosted WordPress site: https://gigesdi.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/dusten-brown/. (And they called my site NOT credible?? I laugh.)
ETA: Oh look! It seems that there is now MORE! It’s actually the WHOLE testimony of Dusten Brown and I personally cannot read it without weeping; I mean if you can read this and still think for one second that this guy has not gotten royal screwed and has done everything he possible could, then you have no heart.
FULL Testimony of Dusten Brown in Adoptive Couple v Baby Girl
Sounds to me; and yes, I am reading between the lines, that Christy Maldonaldo is a immauture thing who got pissed off because Dusten didn’t answer a call or two and didn’t like that he was 4 hours away serving the military. And so, she decided to relinquish the child out of spite. Yes, mother DO relinquish out of spite. I am ashamed to say that I was angry and it was part of my own motivation.
Blame the Leak on the Other Side?
Now here’s the funny part…
As quoted in this super credible site, the “leak” of these documents is credited to @MikiSearch via Twitter!
“A special thank you to Twitter user “Mikisearch” for distributing the recently unsealed family court records for the Indian Child Welfare Act case known as Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl (aka Baby Veronica).”
This is really hysterical, as it’s only the first 15 pages of the court transcripts of Dusten Brown’s testimony. Any fool can easily see that @MikiSearch is a devout Dusten Brown supporter, so IF she HAD the documents of the court transcripts, she would NOT only release the parts that theoretically make Dusten look bad (although I personally think he looks more truthful.) Had she really posted this, she would undoubtedly release the cross examination where Dusten Brown would be EXPLAINING his side of the story (the part that mysteriously is NOT available.)
Plus, I do invite you, whoever is behind the mysterious “Gigesdi.Wordpress.com site,” to give the URL to the original leak credited to MikiSearch. Oh, you cannot? That URL is incredibly not there, why is that? Oh, because it DOESN’T EXIST! Oh, was it on MikiSearch.com? No? Yeah, I’ll get to that site in just a hot minute!
Furthermore, I JUST GOT OFF THE PHONE with Miki and IF she had the transcripts of the whole thing, she would have made sure that I had them in their entirety, so they could be posted here! Doh!
What We Do Know?
The site has only been cached as of today 9-3-13.
Which, for the non-geeky, pretty much means that it didn’t exist before today. Only the site itself has been cached (not the url of the actual post,) which means that the search engine spiders came once and saw the page and post “as is.” That leads me to believe that the site was created and the post put up with the defaming Dusten Brown Court Transcripts all at once.
EDITED TO ADD: I just noticed. I had a comment right here that predates the Tweet! And my response is in progress. I was so excited to add it in here, I didn’t finish it yet! lol
Now, the link to the site where they are posted DID show up on Twitter. In fact, the first instance of the Gigesdi.Wordpress.com link tweeted that I could find (and believe me, I searched!) was done by Stephen Konig @StephenKonig at 12:24 am on 9-3-13. Here’s a screenshot of said tweet with the time stamp:
So let’s just reiterate for a hot minute:
There is nothing on Twitter about these court transcripts on the Baby Veronica Rose Brown case before the 12:24 am Tweet from Stephen Konig, but the Twitter leak is blamed on Miki, while there is no link to the actual original leak. Now, what’s even more amusing is that according to Stephen Konig’s Twitter profile, he’s a Product Manager for Chrome at Google which really means he a) should know better, but b) also knows his way around these things. Sure, his LinkedIn profile does say the same, but… is this the real guy? Or is Twitter a fake? I hate to say that a man high up in Google would be responsible for such a dirty deed!
Okay, I might be assuming, but there are more shady things happening, as well!
Why Mess with MikiSearch?
Again, we have to look at the lack of logic in this public accusation. Once more: MikiSearch supports keeping Veronica Rose Brown in Oklahoma with her biological family, so why only show half the story? And if she had the whole transcript and they only choose to take half to make it look bad, then you would be correct in assuming that the WHOLE transcript of Dusten Brown’s testimony would be showing up here ASAP, but I do not have it! Miki hasn’t leaked anything yet, and doesn’t have a place to do so from… or does she?
So, as we are on the phone, I happen to check and see if there is any place claiming to be here, that was created without her knowledge to “supply” the leak.
Lo and behold, there is a MikiSearch.com! Here’s where it gets even more interesting. The site name, which she does NOT own, was registered on July 7, 2013.
And the domain is registered to an address in New Zealand, but it’s a proxy account. (Meaning that whomever owns it does not want prying eyes like mine to know who they are.)
- owner-contact: WP-1
- owner-organization: c/o whoisproxy.com Ltd.
- owner-fname: On behalf of
- owner-lname: mikisearch.com owner
- owner-street: Plaza Level,41 Shortland Street
- owner-city: Auckland
- owner-zip: 1010
- owner-country: NZ
- owner-phone: +64 4 831 9528
- owner-email: 5490q1RINHPsNFn8eEh1o8KZBRiMH1je3d6LEMyd14OXXdZBlYA@mikisearch.com.whoisproxy.org
Now, in simple terms: the nameservers for this site are the location(s) of the place from whence information comes. The hosts of this website material are listed as :
nameserver: ns1.dsredirection.com
nameserver: ns2.dsredirection.com
And they are REDIRECTION locations. Meaning that info doesn’t really live there, but kind of pretends to. It’s most likely some kind of reseller of domain names, as many on the list are other big hosting companies like GoDaddy. Etc., or it’s a hosting site (meaning website files and email services live there.)
So you are probably wondering, “Live where? What ARE you talking about, Claud?”
Sorry, got all geeky there. Someplace in the world wide web there is an actual physical computer server that holds the files and information about different websites and email addresses. That physical address can be traced. It’s the IP address and it shows where the server box is.
One of them for MikiSearch is 208.73.211.247 and is in LA. I have pulled a few, which makes sense since a large server often changes them out. All of the IPs come back to the same location and another domain as using that IP, but the company is http://www.internap.com/ which is a hosting service, hence, this is where the files for MikiSearch live.
As I look at the physical location of this place (and mind you, I am still on the phone with Miki as I do this), I KNOW this building. In fact, I have traced ANOTHER IP to this very same building before (just recently) for a nasty comment that made it to the Adoption Cyber Bully Map!
And sure enough, I go to my comments and find that M. Martin of Winchester, CA (who uses the email makkmartin11@msn.com from the IP address of 173.58.63.250) also traces to the same location!
And so, here we have it. Something fishy is going on with libel, slander and nasty comments in AdoptionLand and it resides here:
I SEE YOU!!!
Meanwhile, don’t accuse me of hiding any truth.
More Court Documents in Adoptive Couple v Baby Girl 9-2011
It’s only the first 15 pages that SOMEONE released of Dusten Brown’s testimony in the South Carolina trial on September 14, 2011, but that’s all that was leaked by someone who WAS NOT MIKISEARCH!
As I stated, I don’t think those pages are really all that damning. He told the truth, and nothing that was not said before. I see nothing cagey or dishonest, but of course, the questions do not leave him any opportunity to really discuss nor explain anything. THAT part is mysteriously still unavailable.
Here’s the PDF, if you prefer: adoptive couple v baby girl trial transcripts p 518 to 532 . I made this one since PDFs are nice to download, and I do try to make it easier for us believers in facts and reality!
Oh, and if ANYONE wants to leak more documents to me, just send me an email at FixAdoption AT Gmail dot com. I promise I will not sleuth you out. I’ll just share it and do my best to make sure that it ranks for other people seeking the truth about Saving Veronica Rose Brown.
Brilliant. \
You are totally a gas, girl, with the know how of a internet babe.
Oh! the Roberts’s iffy adoption:
Chief Justice John Roberts who sided with four other justices isn’t a disinterested jurist when it comes to adoption. He is an adoptive father and his acquisition of two children known to be Irish–via adopting them from a South American country–has raised a lot of questions. Irish law allows only people living in Ireland to adopt Irish children. They cannot be adopted internationally, as would have been the case–if not for whisking the birth mothers to a third country not bothered by prohibitions against adoption for foreigners.
There’s no public record of how or why these children got to South America, but the facts suggest it was to circumvent Irish law. When The New York Times began looking into his adoptions during his appointment hearings, there were charges of “violation of privacy”, as Wikipedia noted–until recently when this data was scrubbed from his Wikipedia page. Now it simply says he has two adopted children. Roberts and his wife, a lawyer. We note here that he and his wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, married in their forties, and tried to have children, but were unable to and so turned to adoption, but after several failed adoption attempts, “got lucky,” according to the New York Times. Mrs. Roberts comes from an Irish Catholic family–just like the children they got “lucky” to adopt–and a source close to the Roberts family, who requested anonymity in order to discuss judicial deliberations, told The Huffington Post that the justice’s wife, Jane, exercises a “heavy influence” over her husband.
Sadly, Éire is opening up its doors to export now: http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/agreement-with-us-will-open-door-in-adoption-process-29549780.html
Oh I so love it when liars and those with a vested interest in tearing Veronica from her family get their so called “facts” blown clear out of the water! Great sleuthing, lady. This was beyond awesome. Though I wonder how many of those who support the C’s will even understand half of what you’ve done.
Claud? You are the dang bomb dignity! Have I told you how much I simplh adore you lately? Yeah, I do!
You have been an excellent source of facts, I just wish the C supporters actually cared about facts. Or at least cared about morals/ethics or the rights and wants of the little girl they claim to be fighting for.
These are some serious sleuthing superpowers. You rock!
Remind me to not piss you off. LOL. Great job. Fortunately I try to live my life free from lies and deception so I don’t think you would find too much but I ever move to the dark side I would certainly stay away from you. LOL. Thank you for working so hard for the purpose of hopefully bringing out truth.
Claudia…dastardly clever you are….
Well done my friend. And boy am I glad you’re my friend!!
You rock chic. Amazing!!
ronniebrown belongs to the tribe by all means. so the tribe should step-up pursue their authority on this issue. No State court has jurisdiction on our Indian Children. no matter what blood quanum. She does have a parent that isn’t willing to give her away. To the C’s, go back to S.C, and try again but don’t do it underhandedly this time.